http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CDcQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgroups.google.pt%2Fgroup%2Ffilosofia-matematica-conhecimento%2Fbrowse_thread%2Fthread%2F1d3615509f6b5e1d&ei=QmsvULq_BoiXhQf72oCwDA&usg=AFQjCNFyG96oni3N-2uBciWpyin3M8rmhA&sig2=uoiEpEccig575Gkifi4-3Q&cad=rja)
Esse in re… esse in intellectu…, reality is that which resists to all the forms of negation…
Such
as any other systems, all the systems said to be alive, follow an
organizing genetics, conditioned by laws of structure that depend upon the initial formative systemic conditions, which means that the systemic growth and development structurally depend upon imposed anticipatory determinating rules, upon which the respective systems depend, in terms of integrity.
But
what is a rule? What is the nature of a rule? What can be the
ontological status of a rule? How can rules, that a system is unaware of
and that, obviously, didn’t choose, condition all its life? All its
choices? Its actions? Its paths? Because even if the system can rewrite
its initial conditions, that rewriting will, still, be conditioned by
its vital laws of structure.
In this context, what pertinence can there have the projection of scenarios, configured by pre-figurated degrees of freedom? Within what parameters would it be possible to consider planes of systemic transcendence?
Transcendence involves the concept of limit,
to transcend is the act by which someone, or some thing surpasses or
“escapes” the limits imposed by the immanence. An act of transcendence
is an act of projective opening by which the system launches itself, or jumps, towards outside of itself in itself, in that
which, with pertinence, can be designated by systemic jump, that is, the jump that installs in the systemic identity the ontological dyad,
conceptually synthesizable as the other of itself, that which, in the
system, is exterior and heterogeneous to the plane of immanence that
determines it physically.
... experior haec exterior…
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment